Taking on new projects

AI consulting
without the bullshit

I'm an AI consultant and former CTO of uPacjenta. I co-founded Riot Agency, later acquired by Diagnostyka, and led strategy and positioning for Golem Network's decentralised compute for AI. You get decisions: what to ship, what to leave alone, what it costs and where it could fail.

SERVICES

AI consulting for companies:
three packages, transparent terms

ONE-OFF

AI Security /
Agent Risk Audit

Your agent has access to the database, email and APIs. Before it reaches production, I check where it can do damage: prompt injection, data leaking through context, actions with no human in the loop, costs running away. You get a risk list ranked by what to fix first, not a 40-page PDF for the drawer.

A risk map by priority: what blocks production, what can wait
Review of agent architecture and permissions: what they touch, what they can execute
Concrete mitigations: guardrails, human-in-the-loop, limits, logs
A session with your team where I walk through the report line by line
from 4,000 USD

2-3 weeks | deliverable: report + meeting

Ask about an audit
MOST POPULAR
RETAINER

Fractional
CAIO

A part-time Chief AI Officer for a company that has an AI budget and needs someone accountable for how it is used. I set the strategy, watch costs, and decide with you what we build, what we buy and what we leave alone. Billed at one day a week.

AI governance: who can ship AI, on what data, with what accountability
An Architecture Review Board: a quality gate before anything hits production
Vendor strategy: build vs buy, so you don't pay for five overlapping tools
AI cost control: budgets, alerts, real token usage
A weekly C-level sync, plus availability between meetings for decisions
from 3,200 USD/mo

min. 3 months | ~1 day/week

Let's talk
SPECIALIST

Local & Private
AI Infrastructure

For companies that can't, or won't, send data to OpenAI or Anthropic: healthcare, finance, regulated sectors. I stand up local LLMs and Private RAG on your own infrastructure, with inference whose output can be verified and explained to an auditor. I know AI infrastructure strategy from the inside, from Golem Network.

Local LLM deployment on your hardware: no token leaves the company
Private RAG over your documents, with access control
Verifiable inference: logs and a decision trail you can show an auditor
Documentation and team training, so maintenance doesn't hang on me
from 10,700 USD

6-8 weeks | full deployment

Ask about a project
From a delivered project · AI Security / Agent Risk Audit

What those guardrails look like in a real system

Client anonymized, figures straight from the repository. This was a build, not an audit engagement — it is here because these four things are exactly what I look for in someone else's system.

Problem

A global brand's communications team was grading hundreds of publications a month by hand. Slow, subjective, and with no trail anyone could audit afterwards.

Intervention

An agentic pipeline in which the model returns only how a publication relates to each pillar of the brand strategy. Code computes the total and the verdict, not the model.

Verification

A QA loop checks quotes word for word, that the label matches the score, and that every pillar is covered. When validation fails, one automatic stricter pass runs.

Deliverable

A service in production: a model layer swappable across three providers, daily and monthly reports, token-cost tracking, and an enforced 80% test-coverage threshold.

0 verdicts without a supporting quote
Read the full case study and the other four →
Ad hoc advisory
from $300 / hour

Need a second pair of eyes without a package? I bill by the hour. A package works out cheaper per day because you are buying commitment and predictability, not access on demand.

WHY ME

I advise from what
I built myself

My experience includes serving as CTO of uPacjenta, co-founding Riot Agency, which Diagnostyka acquired, and leading strategy and positioning at Golem Network. Here are the roles and projects behind my advice.

1
exit: Riot Agency to Diagnostyka
2020–22
CTO of uPacjenta
2024
WebX Tokyo speaker
2026
AI Summit keynote at Next Block Expo

I served as CTO of uPacjenta. I've made technology decisions with accountability for delivery, budgets and reliability.

I've worked on AI infrastructure strategy. As Head of Strategy & Product at Golem Network, I led strategy and positioning for decentralised compute for AI and worked alongside the CPO and CTO on product direction.

I work on real systems. My projects include a brand-alignment agent pilot, TenderFlow in Anmar's B2B platform and a physical-AI command-and-control prototype validated in simulation. I make the scope and maturity of each result clear.

I'll also tell you when AI is the wrong call. AI is a tool, not magic: it won't fix a broken process. You measure or you're guessing. If the problem is cheaper to solve without models, you'll hear it from me.

On stage since 2014.
WebX Tokyo 2024Next Block Expo 2026 — AI Summit keynoteWaysConf Kraków 2026 — masterclassMobile Trends 2017 nomination"AI in journalism" training for TVP (national TV)
PROCESS

Four steps,
zero theater

01

Diagnosis

I look at what you actually have: data, processes, team, your earlier attempts at AI. I tell you plainly what's ready to ship and what needs fixing without AI first.

02

Decision

A concrete recommendation: what to build, what to buy, what to leave alone. With a cost estimate and a risk list: an artifact the board can decide on, not 40 slides.

03

First rollout

One use case shipped to production, not to a slide. Iterations on real data, with a metric that tells you whether it works. If it can't be measured, we turn back.

04

Governance & handoff

Rules, monitoring and cost control so AI scales safely. By the end your team runs it on its own, without a monthly invoice from me.

This is for you if:

  • A 50-500-person company where AI is a business decision, not an R&D toy
  • An AI budget of $25k+ a year, actually allocated
  • The "we're doing this" decision is made: you're looking for how, not whether
  • A CTO or VP Engineering who owns the project
  • One named problem to solve, not "the whole company on AI"

Let's skip it if:

  • You're a pre-revenue startup after free strategy, or want a CTO who works for equity
  • The budget is "to be determined", meaning there isn't one
  • You want AI because a competitor announced theirs
  • There's no sponsor on the board to carry the decisions
  • You're counting on AI to fix a process that's broken without it
FAQ

AI consulting — common questions

How much does AI consulting cost? +

Three packages with public pricing: agent security audit from 4,000 USD, Fractional CAIO from 3,200 USD/month, Local & Private AI infrastructure from 10,700 USD. Outside the packages I bill ad hoc advisory by the hour, from 300 USD. Final quote after an intro call — it depends on scope.

How long does an engagement take? +

Audit: 2–3 weeks, ending with a report and a working session. Fractional CAIO: minimum 3 months, ~1 day a week. Private AI infrastructure: 6–8 weeks to full deployment.

Do you work remotely or on-site? +

Remote by default — for clients across Poland and the EU. On-site where it makes sense: decision workshops, kick-offs, board sessions.

What about data security and NDAs? +

An NDA is standard before any detailed conversation. For sensitive data I design Private AI architectures with local models — your data never leaves your infrastructure.

How is consulting different from implementation? +

Consulting is decisions: what to build, in what architecture, at what risk — plus oversight of execution. The building itself I deliver as AI implementations, and I level up teams through the enterprise AI workshop.

INQUIRY

Describe the problem,
I reply within 24h

The inquiry lands in my own inbox and one person reads it. You get a straight answer back, or a couple of questions — no deck, no email sequence.

I'll use your address only to reply to this inquiry. Privacy policy

NEXT STEP

30 minutes
and you'll know where you stand

No salesperson, no slides. You walk me through the problem and I tell you straight: whether I have a sensible way to solve it, what it really costs, and whether it's even worth it. If it's not for me, you'll hear that in the same call, with a pointer on where to look.